<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GadgetyTech &#187; Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetytech.com/category/applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetytech.com</link>
	<description>A rechargeable, touch screen love fest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Managing Too Many Tweets with TweetDeck</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/02/14/managing-too-many-tweets-with-tweetdeck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/02/14/managing-too-many-tweets-with-tweetdeck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetytech.com/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When someone first starts with Twitter, the web interface is usually enough.  They&#8217;re following a few people and the single column classic layout is completely adequate.  Then they follow a few more and a few more, a snowball effect begins to occur, and they realize something.  There are some people they are more passionate about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.gadgetytech.com/images/tweetdeck.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="291" /><br />
When someone first starts with <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, the web interface is usually enough.  They&#8217;re following a few people and the single column classic layout is completely adequate.  Then they follow a few more and a few more, a snowball effect begins to occur, and they realize something.  There are some people they are more passionate about following than others.  Whether it&#8217;s family, close friends, or colleagues from work, people who follow more than a few dozen others on Twitter will start to miss things they don&#8217;t want to miss.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/beta/" target="_blank">TweetDeck</a>, developed by Iain Dodsworth, addresses this problem with the ability to track ten different columns of tweets.  Each is user definable: You can see all the people you follow, replies to you, groups of people you define, Or special purpose things like <a href="http://www.stocktwits.com" target="_blank">StockTwits.com</a> or <a href="http://www.12seconds.tv" target="_blank">12seconds.tv</a>.  This week, TweetDeck saw a new update that has added a number of good features that make it even nicer to use, including the ability to translate tweets and a function to email them to people not on Twitter.</p>
<p>TweetDeck requires <a href="http://get.adobe.com/air/" target="_blank">Adobe AIR</a> to be installed, then the software can be downloaded from the <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/beta/" target="_blank">developer&#8217;s web</a> site.  It&#8217;s available for Mac, Windows and Linux and the developer keeps users up to date on his <a href="http://tweetdeck.posterous.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>.  It&#8217;s currently in beta, but it&#8217;s very solid, and used heavily across Twitter.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Cali Lewis has posted an <a href="http://www.geekbrief.tv/gbtv-517-how-to-tweetdeck-like-a-pro" target="_blank">excellent screencast walkthrough</a> of TweetDeck over at GeekBrief.TV. Check it out if you think TweetDeck might be for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/02/14/managing-too-many-tweets-with-tweetdeck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playing Along with GarageBand &#8216;09</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/02/02/playing-along-with-garageband-09/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/02/02/playing-along-with-garageband-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/02/02/playing-along-with-garageband-09/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in college, I played around with the guitar in a very informal, self-taught way. For some reason, I fell out of the habit of practicing and left it untouched for about 20 years.  When GarageBand &#8216;09 came out with its &#8220;Learn to Play&#8221; feature, I thought I&#8217;d give it a try both with guitar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in college, I played around with the guitar in a very informal, self-taught way. For some reason, I fell out of the habit of practicing and left it untouched for about 20 years.  When <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/garageband/">GarageBand &#8216;09</a> came out with its &#8220;Learn to Play&#8221; feature, I thought I&#8217;d give it a try both with guitar and piano.</p>
<p>I tried the guitar lessons first, as that was where I had more experience and felt a bit more comfortable.  The first thing to know is that the basic installation from the iLife &#8216;09 disc gives one introductory piano lesson and one for guitar.  By connecting to the Lesson Store, you can download eight more lesson for each instrument for free.  &#8220;Artist Lessons&#8221;, where musicians like John Fogerty, Norah Jones and Sting teach you how to play their songs, are $4.99 each.  The Lesson Store is very basic now, but if this feature takes off, I&#8217;d expect to see a lot more offerings here.</p>
<p>Both instruments&#8217; lessons (at least in the early ones I ran through) feature a male instructor named Tim who walks you through the basics. The lessons are in video form with integrated animated images depicting music notation and the keyboard or finger board.  The general feel is very similar to the promo videos Apple creates to demonstrate a new product.  The lesson is broken into several parts and there is a &#8220;cycle&#8221; option that allows the student to set a part of the video to repeat until the skill is mastered.  The video can also be slowed down, if it&#8217;s too hard to keep up with the pace of the music at full speed.</p>
<p>The one element that I wasn&#8217;t impressed by was the built-in guitar tuning feature.  Before beginning, I had tuned with an external electronic tuner.  The principal is that you play a certain string, and adjust the tuning key until a needle on the face of the device is straight in the middle of its scale. Once I started the first guitar lesson, I learned there was a built-in feature that essentially worked the same way.  Except it didn&#8217;t really work. On some strings it would show way too low, then way too high, with only the slightest change made in between.  Other strings seemed to tune okay, except the end result was very off key and a bit painful to hear.  I wound up having to retune with the external tuner.  I&#8217;m not sure what went wrong, but I suppose the tuner function is very dependent on the computer&#8217;s mic (I was using the  internal mic on my MacBook Pro), and the guitar&#8217;s angle and proximity to the pickup.  I very much like the idea of an software-intgrated tuner, but it just didn&#8217;t work out for me.</p>
<p>Everything else, though was really quite impressive.  I&#8217;m even inspired to stick with the lessons and try to get back to the guitar after two decades away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/02/02/playing-along-with-garageband-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhoto &#8216;09 &#8211; Putting Faces Through Its Paces</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/01/28/iphoto-09-putting-faces-through-its-paces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/01/28/iphoto-09-putting-faces-through-its-paces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/01/28/iphoto-09-putting-faces-through-its-paces/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent last night installing iLife &#8216;09 and trying out the Faces facial recognition feature in the new version of iPhoto. The usability in the application is excellent.  I&#8217;m a terrible one for reading instructions.  My preference is to just jump in and see how much of a device or piece of software I can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent last night installing <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/">iLife &#8216;09</a> and trying out the Faces facial recognition feature in the new version of iPhoto. The usability in the application is excellent.  I&#8217;m a terrible one for reading instructions.  My preference is to just jump in and see how much of a device or piece of software I can figure out with the controls and options presented.  iPhoto passed this test quite well, and I was immediately able to start working with the Faces feature, without mis-steps.</p>
<p>The question most people are interested in hearing about is, how good is the facial recognition? In a lot of cases, really good.  But the farther the angle strays from straight on, the tougher a time the software has.  On the same person, if given a straight on shot, it did quite well.  It even did reasonably well identifying a face on a quarter-turn left or right.  It has real problems with profiles.  I taught it several almost identical shots of the same face in profile, but it could not apply that to other profile shots of the same person taken at the same time.  It seems to have a strong sense that two eyes (open or closed) are required for a face.</p>
<p>A person wearing glasses can also give some false matches as the software identifies other people also wearing glasses with the bespectacled face it has learned.</p>
<p>This should not be taken as a panning of the functionality.  Given what&#8217;s being attempted, the success rate is very, very good. So good, that it&#8217;s easy to forget what a tricky thing is being done, causing expectation of more nearly perfect results.  For a first generation of this feature in iPhoto, I&#8217;m very impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/01/28/iphoto-09-putting-faces-through-its-paces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macworld San Francisco 2009 Keynote</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/01/06/macworld-san-francisco-2009-keynote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/01/06/macworld-san-francisco-2009-keynote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/01/06/macworld-san-francisco-2009-keynote/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big things out of the 2009 Macworld Keynote were an upgrade of iLife, iWork, a new 17&#8243; MacBook Pro, and new flexibility in iTunes pricing.
In iPhoto, the new &#8220;Faces&#8221; feature will recognize a face when you link it with a name and will associate that name to the same face in any future images, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big things out of the 2009 Macworld Keynote were an upgrade of iLife, iWork, a new 17&#8243; MacBook Pro, and new flexibility in iTunes pricing.</p>
<p>In iPhoto, the new &#8220;Faces&#8221; feature will recognize a face when you link it with a name and will associate that name to the same face in any future images, making visual searching of photos possible. &#8220;Places&#8221; offers searches of locations using geotagging entered by GPS-enabled gear like the iPhone or Eye-Fi cards.  Manual tagging is also possible for non-GPS enhanced photos.</p>
<p>Enhancements to iMovie include the ability to separate video from audio and move them through your project independently, a set of new special effects, and a nice map feature that adds 2-D or 3-D maps to travel-related videos.</p>
<p>GarageBand adds an interesting new aspect in that it will actually provide basic lessons for guitar and piano, taught by artists such as Sting, John Fogarty and Norah Jones.  So even if your musical skills are limited or non-existent, you can learn a little something and create some music with GarageBand</p>
<p>The new iLife 09 ships in late-January, priced at $79 for  single-seat license, or $99 for a family pack.</p>
<p>In the world of iWork 09, Apple is introducing Keynote Remote, an iPhone/iPod Touch app that allows remote control of presentations.  Also new charts and templates for Numbers.  The iWork package is also $79 single-seat, and $99 for a family pack, shipping immediately.</p>
<p>Google Docs, with its collaborative, cloud-based productivity software has inspired the online, <a href="http://iwork.com" target="_blank">iWork.com</a>, launching today.  You can edit docs online, as with the Google offering.</p>
<p>In hardware, a 17&#8243; MacBook Pro was announced that uses the same uni-body construction that was rolled out for the 15&#8243; model last year.  The display is 1920 x 1200 resolution and offers an anti-glare option (something many people have been clamoring after).  Ports are one Firewire 800 and three USB.  Maximum RAM is now doubled at 8 GB.  Of course, it also has the glass trackpad of the smaller MackBook Pro.  Probably most impressive is the battery life: A promised eight hours, absolutely unheard of for a laptop battery prior to this.  The downside is that the battery is not removable.  The new system starts shipping in late January with a base price of $2799.</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s iTunes Music Store will offer a three-tier pricing structure, with songs available at 69 cents, 99 cents, and $1.29.  In the iTunes Plus tier ($1.29), 8 million songs are now offered DRM-free and by the end of the quarter, all 10 million songs will be available without DRM.  Also starting today you can buy music on your iPhone across a 3G network, rather than just Wi-Fi.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be back later with more news and products from the Macworld Expo floor.  Thanks for reading and stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2009/01/06/macworld-san-francisco-2009-keynote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Flock to Tame Wild Twitter Storms</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2008/04/11/using-flock-to-tame-wild-twitter-storms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2008/04/11/using-flock-to-tame-wild-twitter-storms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetytech.com/2008/04/11/using-flock-to-tame-wild-twitter-storms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s increasing discussion about the social networking site Twitter going around the net.  Some love it (I’d be in that group), some are confused by it, and some can’t understand why otherwise reasonable people spend so much time exchanging fairly mundane (or personal) details of their lives in what can be an extremely public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s increasing discussion about the social networking site <a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> going around the net.  Some love it (I’d be in that group), some are confused by it, and some can’t understand why otherwise reasonable people spend so much time exchanging fairly mundane (or personal) details of their lives in what can be an extremely public forum.</p>
<p>If you’re unfamiliar with Twitter, here are the basics: Posts (“tweets” in Twitter-speak) are limited to 140 characters. There is a public timeline where all tweets appear (unless their author has opted out), and a personal timeline for each user.  In the personal timeline, the tweets of all the people/entities that the user has chosen to follow are displayed chronologically.  Finally, there are two basic kinds of tweets: Original and replies (which are preceded by an @ and the user name the reply is directed toward).</p>
<p>Some people use Twitter as a one-way broadcast, telling the world what they are doing and sometimes promoting their projects.  They often don’t follow anyone.  Others mix in an occasional reply or brief back-and-forth conversation.  And some people use it for extended conversations, in the style of an instant messaging client.</p>
<p>This can cause a problem, as Twitter displays tweets in sequential screens, and if you follow someone who tweets a great deal (replies or originals) they can quickly obscure the people you’re trying to follow.  An example here is the useful, but highly prolific and often repetitive <a href="http://www.engadget.com/" target="_blank">Engadget</a> feed:<br />
<img src="http://www.gadgetytech.com/Flock_0.png" alt="Flock screen 1" align="middle" height="473" width="417" /></p>
<p>As you can see, poor <a href="http://twitter.com/ijustine" target="_blank">iJustine</a> is getting buried in gadget news. You then must decide whether to “un-follow” the verbose tweeter, track them separately, such as bookmarking their timeline, but keeping them out of your own, or just resign yourself to having to go through many pages of their tweets in order to see everyone else’s.</p>
<p>My solution involves the excellent browser <a href="http://www.flock.com/" target="_blank">Flock</a>.  I started using Flock back in December after it was covered on <a href="http://daily.mahalo.com/" target="_blank">Mahalo Daily</a>.  Besides being a solid, stable piece of software (high praise in the browser world), Flock adds in features designed to compliment social networking sites like Facebook, Flickr and Twitter.  Flock features a sidebar that appears to the left of the browsing window.  Configured to display Twitter, it looks something like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.gadgetytech.com/Flock_1.png" alt="Flock screen 2" align="middle" height="668" width="403" /></p>
<p>Your most recent tweet shows at the top against a gray background, then all the people you follow display, ordered by how recently they’ve posted an update. If new updates from other users occur, they are displayed automatically at the top, nearly live (I’ve seen a three or four minute lag between when a tweet is posted on Twitter and when it refreshes in the sidebar.)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.gadgetytech.com/Flock_2.png" alt="Flock screen 3" align="middle" height="746" width="402" /></p>
<p>This provides a clean, clear view of people you’re interested in, while not letting any single user display more than one tweet at a time.  Only their most recent one shows.  If I see something I want to follow up, I go to a browser tab I keep loaded with my Twitter home page (which can be loaded by clicking the word “Twitter” at the top of the sidebar).  Clicking on any user’s name in the display will take you to their personal timeline in a browser window.  Using Flock like this requires very minimal setup, just logging in once to your Twitter account through an interface provided by Flock.  If you don’t log out again, it will remember you and open correctly each time you launch the browser.</p>
<p>Flock is available for Windows, Mac and Linux platforms.  If you’re interested in seeing what I talk about when I’m not blogging here, you can follow me at <a href="http://twitter.com/davepeterson" target="_blank">twitter.com/davepeterson</a>.  And thanks to <a href="http://www.nealcampbell.com" target="_blank">Neal Campbell</a> for suggesting I turn a short comment I left on his blog into this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2008/04/11/using-flock-to-tame-wild-twitter-storms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Do You Want Your Apps?</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2008/03/12/where-do-you-want-your-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2008/03/12/where-do-you-want-your-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Peterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetytech.com/2008/03/12/where-do-you-want-your-apps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent interview with Ray Ozzie, Chief Software Architect at Microsoft, got me thinking about the differences between computing that&#8217;s local to the desktop, versus that which runs on the Internet. Internet-based applications are nothing new, but the successful implementation of things like Google Docs are taking the concept mainstream.  There are several advantages to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/03/10/the-gigaom-interview-ray-ozzie-microsoft-corp/" target="_blank">A recent interview with Ray Ozzie</a>, Chief Software Architect at Microsoft, got me thinking about the differences between computing that&#8217;s local to the desktop, versus that which runs on the Internet. Internet-based applications are nothing new, but the successful implementation of things like Google Docs are taking the concept mainstream.<span>  </span>There are several advantages to keeping documents online: Accessibility from any machine, ability to do real-time collaboration with other people (either across the table or on the other side of the world), and immediate updates of the application software.<span>  </span>The downside, of course, is that if you are somewhere with no Internet access (or no data signal, if on a mobile device), you can&#8217;t get to your documents. And connectivity can fail at the app provider&#8217;s end as well as the user who can&#8217;t pick up a signal with his Blackberry.<span>  </span>The web today is like a rollercoaster, with sites small and big going down, coming back up, going down again&#8230; sometimes for extended periods. One of the advantages could also be seen as a disadvantage, if you don&#8217;t necessarily want your application updating without your permission.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">I think there are three main obstacles to moving applications from the desktop to &#8220;the cloud&#8221;, and they&#8217;re all network-centric ones.<span>  </span>First is availability of a network connection: depending on how and where you use the application, this may or may not be much of an issue, but anyone who travels with a laptop or smaller computing device will get it. Even if we can&#8217;t connect to the net, we want to be able to do <em>something</em>.<span>  </span>In December 2006, there was a snow storm in the </span><st1:city><st1:place><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Seattle</span></st1:place></st1:city><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> area that put out power for a lot of people for several days, and in many residential areas, the major provider of broadband connectivity was out for a week after power came back. Second, is speed. For people to feel comfortable shifting their daily use software to a remote server the speed to load and interact with the application will have to be comparable to what they experience with a local hard drive.<span>  </span>Finally, security will have to be on a par with what is used for online financial transactions today. Another interesting thing to consider is how this style of providing software will be priced.<span>  </span>Some apps may be free and advertiser supported, but most regular users probably won&#8217;t want banner ads surrounding their work.<span>  </span>A monthly or annual subscription scheme?<span>  </span>Or something that meters use and bills accordingly.<span>  </span>Will it be like the cable bill or the power bill?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">In spite of (or because of, depending on your viewpoint) all these factors, application deployment is moving to the web.<span>  </span>Software on physical (and local) disc, whether movies, music, or word processing programs is starting to fade out.<span>  </span>In retrospect, keeping everything local seems more like a technological inheritance from the old unconnected world of stand-alone beige boxes than anything that would have been chosen if viable alternatives were available.<span>  </span>Now they are becoming available and the patchwork conversion begins.</span><span style="font-family: Arial"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gadgetytech.com/2008/03/12/where-do-you-want-your-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

